Ethics and logic

The final end purpose, or teleology of a thing is realized in the full perfection of the object itself, not in our conception of it. If we take the above view that the good is happiness, and plug it into Plain Consequentialism, we get the view that the right action is the one that causes the most happiness—more than would have been caused by any of the available alternative actions.

Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory, by H. That by all our choices, whether intentions, words, attitudes and actions we seek to make God known.

Aristotle's Ethics

Here begins Levinas's protracted insistence that Being is continuous presence, not, as Heidegger insisted, an event of disclosure and withdrawal. His intention in Book I of the Ethics is to indicate in a general way why the virtues are important; why particular virtues—courage, justice, and the like—are components of happiness is something we should be able to better understand only at a later point.

In however, the difficulty of holding together the time and passivity likened to aging OBBE, 54with the flowing time of consciousness and its projections toward future possibilities, is more obvious in the text.

For the first, his thought is thoroughly humanistic, with Infinity proving a more rarefied concept of divinity than Maimonides' apophatics. In his middle period, Levinas also addresses our openness to the world, privileging it over questions of Being.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Rather his idea seems to be that in addition to our full-fledged reasoning capacity, we also have psychological mechanisms that are capable of a limited range of reasoning.

His project is to make ethics an autonomous field, and to show why a full understanding of what is good does not require expertise in any other field. But it holds thus, and I shall begin from here to take care of justice. Philosophy in the twentieth century Heidegger, the Frankfurt School, deconstruction has shown, at least, that the universality of concepts and the necessity carried by transcendental arguments are simply not sufficient to prevent the triumph of ends-rationality and instrumentalization.

Do we want what we want because we are self-centered, greedy, unthankful, or vengeful? It recognizes the common qualities which are involved in all particular objects of sensation. It in turn acts, and,distinguishing between the qualities of outward things, becomes "a movement of the soul through the medium of the body.

One of his reasons for thinking that such a life is superior to the second-best kind of life—that of a political leader, someone who devotes himself to the exercise of practical rather than theoretical wisdom—is that it requires less external equipment a23—b7.

Value Quotes

Collections of Philosophical Essays and Lectures: Transcendence is the spontaneity of responsibility for another person. The act is the same in each case: Nevertheless, desire in Totality and Infinity always proves to be double.

See Geach ; Foot ; Thomson However, once one introduces such a complex standard of goodness for consequences, questions arise as to how to rate the relative importance of the parts of the standard and about how such a view can be given theoretical elegance.

This fact is as real and certain as anything written in the Bible. We may sometimes act not to produce a benefit, but in order to obey a principle we accept. Here he is influenced by an idea expressed in the opening line of the Ethics: It is not enough to say that it is what happens when we are in good condition and are active in unimpeded circumstances; one must add to that point the further idea that pleasure plays a certain role in complementing something other than itself.

Discovering Existence with Husserl. Although we must be fortunate enough to have parents and fellow citizens who help us become virtuous, we ourselves share much of the responsibility for acquiring and exercising the virtues.

What is most remarkable about Aristotle's discussion of akrasia is that he defends a position close to that of Socrates. He cites and endorses an argument given by Plato in the Philebus: It says that among all the very many things we could do at any given time, only one or a very few of them are right.

I could decide to sacrifice you to my gods and you cannot say that what I do is wrong in any meaningful way. Memory is defined as the permanent possession of the sensuous picture as a copy which represents the object of which it is a picture. Opening pages of 'Age of Reason' Thus passes away all man's life.

Before explaining this point, we should note that consequentialism on most versions is a theory about the moral quality of actions. No citizen, he says, belongs to himself; all belong to the city a28—9. Pleasure occurs when something within us, having been brought into good condition, is activated in relation to an external object that is also in good condition.

There have been pre-formal treatises on argument and dialectic, from authors such as Stephen Toulmin The Uses of ArgumentNicholas Rescher Dialectics[32] [33] [34] and van Eemeren and Grootendorst Pragma-dialectics. The Third Earl of ShaftesburyEnglish politician and philosopher in 'An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, or Merit' Plate sin with gold, and the strong lance of justice hurtless breaks; arm it in rags, a pigmy's straw does pierce it.

Ethical Reflections: Ethics & Logic

That excludes from transcendence not only an intentional component already bracketed by Levinas's phenomenologybut also anything like moral sentiments or innate capacities to be affected by the other. We began our discussion of these qualities in section 4. What he must have in mind, when he says that virtue makes the goal right, is that deliberation typically proceeds from a goal that is far more specific than the goal of attaining happiness by acting virtuously.

In other words, one must ask whether the action promotes benefit overall.1. Preliminaries. Aristotle wrote two ethical treatises: the Nicomachean Ethics and the Eudemian does not himself use either of these titles, although in the Politics (a36) he refers back to one of them—probably the Eudemian Ethics—as “ta êthika”—his writings about words “Eudemian” and “Nicomachean” were added later, perhaps because the former was.

A Unified Analysis of Attitudes: Bridging the De Re / De Dicto / De Qualitate Divide. Speaker: Christopher Tancredi From: Keio University URL: Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products.

The morality of transformational leadership has been sharply questioned, particularly by libertarians, “grass roots” theorists, and organizational development consultants. As nouns the difference between ethics and logic is that ethics is (philosophy) the study of principles relating to right and wrong conduct while logic is (uncountable) a method of human thought that involves thinking in a linear, step-by-step manner about how a problem can be solved logic is the basis of many principles including the scientific.

Start studying Ethics & Logic. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

Ethics and logic
Rated 3/5 based on 85 review